Page 2 of 2

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: March 3rd, 2019, 7:06 pm
by Loler
So many people didn't use resist on osi cause of trap pouch too. When i played blood oath was how crit is saying though but i quit before sa came out. And any info written in uoguide should be taken with a grain of salt.

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: March 29th, 2019, 5:31 am
by Vitek-
Bump

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 8:11 pm
by Vitek-
SUPER BUMP now that it's fel-wide casting. Necro is shit without oath on this casting.

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 8:14 pm
by Loler
Necro is great on this casting you crazy man. Strangle is so good with 120 spirit. Problem still is everyone bolts off screen when you get them to 99% hp.

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 8:46 pm
by Josh
I agree with loler that necro is very good now (it was fairly good on demise casting too).
But I also agree that blood oath change would be dope (assuming that’s how it worked during ml).
-idk if anyone has a video from the past using blood oh in pvp? That’d be extra helpful.

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 10:50 pm
by Vitek-
60 necro temp

i agree strangle is good but when you run 60 necro for oath/corpse/omen/spike which is a viable osi temp it's kinda shit

video is posted with how oath works just not gonna find one from 10 years ago. up to eos if she wants to code it to work like it should but it should definitely be done w/o question. it's how it worked since at least 2005 when i started

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 11:02 pm
by Josh
It’s just the documentation says otherwise which is normally what she refers to in order to decide, but also the documents currently are obviously wrong so idk how she’ll decide.

I’m down for it personally, I don’t think it’ll be imbalanced.

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 11:08 pm
by royal kapero2
You need to cast EO + blood oath.. Magic resists counters % of damage returned.

Re: [NEW] Blood Oath

Posted: April 2nd, 2019, 11:10 pm
by Vitek-
correct, but it's still shit.

Yeah, their docs are demonstrably wrong.