This is the post I conceded you dont always mortal spam, was a few posts back.Josh wrote: You focused on “I DONT MORTAL SPAM,” and avoided the discussion entirely. But yea man you “proved me wrong.” Aight, you don’t always mortal spam, I’ll concede that, it doesn’t matter to the overall discussionz then I stopped typing originally Bc I could see you were going just do some retarded shit and focus on some shit that didn’t matter in the overall discussion.
(Hint about argumentation and how it works: say “I don’t do that,” here’s an example then answer the rest of the discussion, don’t pretend I’m the one deflecting and you somehow proved me wrong dipshit, proving one small non-sequetor doesn’t mean your entire argument is true).
This is the most recent post, says basically the same thing as the first.Josh wrote:Lol, yet you’ve posted everytime, I’m on my phone too.Loler wrote:Theres a video of chad dieng 1v5 and a video of script dieing 1v3. I use 1 mortal to kill both players. I don't spam mortal the Dr won't have an affect on me it just doesn't belong in this era.
And im sorry you post 15 different posts plus im not on my computer to see every little thing you posted. He'll as i posted this message you posted the 3rd time in a row
As per the 3 posts, 1 was 1 sentence, the 2nd was a clarifying question and the 3rd was just giving you reasons why you’re retarded for thinking you proved me wrong.
When you focus on things that aren’t related to the overall argument, that’s not proving someone wrong on the overall topic.
P.s. I conceded the you mortal spam thing (don’t care enough to watch videos or argue it), it doesn’t mean anything within the overall discussion.
I said you mortal spam, I removed the "you dont want bc it'll nerf you" bc I felt it was redundant.
I conceded that two posts ago (the ones directed at you).
edit: this was the post before the first quote of mine on this thread.Josh wrote:Confused by what this means bc the sentence structure is retarded. Are you saying mortal spam is good for 1v5 1v3 and you wouldn’t be able to do that with diminishing returns or immunity?Loler wrote:Yeah spamming mortal 1v5 and 1v3 mate wouldn't be able go do that with a Dr or immunity.
If you’re saying you need mortal spam for 1v5s and 1v3s, then I don’t think you understand what the word “balanced” means. Balance discussions should be generally focused on even fights not outnumbered fights.
I asked for clarification on this one, bc the sentence structure was weird. It might be what you're confused about where "i kept proving points" or whatever. I didn't mean for it to be about you mortal spamming in particular just that balance discussions shouldn't be about outnumbered fights rather it should be based on even numbered fights. Because being able to kill someone 1v3 or 1v5 better supports the argument that it's op than it's good to have.
TL;DR im not making points about you mortal spamming anymore, I conceded you might not spam, then made arguments about why the proposal is balanced and shit talked a little, of course.