This would be cool hehehe.Made In Quebec wrote:or /wipe
and sit down and laugh.
(But prolly just cause then everyone would be as poor as me for a day hehe)
This would be cool hehehe.Made In Quebec wrote:or /wipe
and sit down and laugh.
A wipe followed by a tight fucking rule enforcementLoler wrote:yeah but then in like 2 weeks the gap will be the same as before.
This, and then code it to only go up to 9 digits so anything over 999,999,999 gold disappears. Not sure if vendor gold is separate from the main gold stash, but if it is, then make the limit 8 digits for the bank and for the vendors. If you get more gold than that, donate it to the library/zoo/museum or give it to another player, or watch it get wasted.ortiz wrote:New osi gold system. 0 down side to this that I can think of.
medamaude wrote:I'm mostly talking out my ass here because I don't know how or if this would work, BUT
This, and then code it to only go up to 9 digits so anything over 999,999,999 gold disappears. Not sure if vendor gold is separate from the main gold stash, but if it is, then make the limit 8 digits for the bank and for the vendors. If you get more gold than that, donate it to the library/zoo/museum or give it to another player, or watch it get wasted.ortiz wrote:New osi gold system. 0 down side to this that I can think of.
Bonus points if you can code it so that going over the limit causes it to roll over to 0.
Problem: they'll just use collateral and trade with items. Aka current system. Also, worth noting items gain value and gold loses [the right items...]medamaude wrote: 9 digits
Don't feel bad, it's a very difficult situation to handle, especially with understaffing and inactivity.medamaude wrote:Okay then don't do that I guess, IDK
Bama wrote:Opywang wrote:You have to pertitipate
Is that like Mittittippi
Fuck off
Oh no it's fine, I sometimes throw out harebrained ideas knowing they're harebrained, but hoping they spark a good idea in someone else.The Silvertiger wrote:Don't feel bad, it's a very difficult situation to handle, especially with understaffing and inactivity.medamaude wrote:Okay then don't do that I guess, IDK